• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Request a consultation – Call today (559) 222-5800

dui lawyer fresno

Fresno DUI Attorney & Criminal Defense Lawyer

  • Practice Areas
    • DUI Defense
      • Boating Under the Influence
      • Marijuana DUI Defense
      • Underage DUI Defense
    • Criminal Defense
    • Personal Injury
      • Motor Vehicle Accident
    • Domestic Violence
    • Drug Crimes
    • Expungement
  • About
  • Resources
    • California DUI Laws
    • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Practice Areas
    • DUI Defense
      • Boating Under the Influence
      • Marijuana DUI Defense
      • Underage DUI Defense
    • Criminal Defense
    • Personal Injury
      • Motor Vehicle Accident
    • Domestic Violence
    • Drug Crimes
    • Expungement
  • About
  • Resources
    • California DUI Laws
    • Blog
  • Contact Us

New ruling impacting DMV license suspensions

Home / Blog / New ruling impacting DMV license suspensions

April 21, 2022 //  by Gregory Fox

Currently, the California Department of Motor Vehicles holds administrative hearings to determine if an individual’s driving privilege should be suspended following an arrest for driving under the influence.  These proceedings have been taking place for years in California.  At the hearings, the Department of Motor Vehicles appoints an employee who acts as both the prosecutor and judge.

Just last week the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal for the State of California issued a decision in California DUI Lawyers Association v. the California Department of Motor Vehicles (2022) Cal.App.Lexis 316, which impacts all pending administrative hearings conducted in California following an arrest for driving under the influence.  In essence, the CDLA court found that the current process used by the DMV at APS hearings violates a driver’s due process rights by the use of a DMV employee to act as an advocate for the DMV and the judge in the proceedings.

Citing California law, the CDLA court explained that although procedural fairness does not prohibit the combination of the advocacy and adjudicatory functions within a single administrative agency, tasking the same individual with both roles violates the minimum constitutional standards of due process.  The court further held that Vehicle Code section 14112 subdivision (b) that exempts APS hearings from the separation of functions requirement outlined in Government Code section 11425.30 is unconstitutional to the extent it allows the DMV to combine the advocacy and adjudicatory roles in a single APS hearing officer.

The CDLA court entered a permanent injunction that states the DMV is permanently enjoined and restrained from having its APS hearing officers function as advocates for the position of the DMV in addition to being finders of fact in the same adversarial proceeding.

What does this mean for California drivers?  Well for now it means that the DMV can no longer use a single employee to conduct the APS hearings.  Today our office has been contacted by the DMV on multiple pending cases requesting to continue the hearings.  How the issue will ultimately be decided is unclear.  What is certain is that the DMV will appeal the decision of the court.  Once we have more information, we will post an update.

If you have any questions about how this impacts your pending case or license suspension, call us at (559) 222-5800.

Category: Blog

Previous Post: « California New Misdemeanor Diversion Program
Next Post: California Remote Court Appearances, Penal Code section 977 »

Primary Sidebar

Search posts

Request a consultation

If you have any questions or would like to request a consultation please call (559) 222-5800 or fill out this form and we will contact you as soon as possible.











    Related Posts

    Lose Your Sobriety, Lose Your Driver’s License, Lose Your Job, Ten Steps to Consider if Arrested for Driving Under the Influence, The Right to a Fair Hearing Following an Arrest for Driving Under the Influence, How to Obtain a Restricted License After a Second DUI Conviction
    This website provides general information only. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. The law is constantly changing and differs from location to location. Applicability of the law is dependent upon the facts and circumstances of each case. You should consult an attorney about your particular situation. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute an attorney–client relationship between the sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

    If you have any questions, or would like to request a consultation, please contact us today at (559) 222-5800. Hablamos español.

    Footer

    About

    Gregory W. Fox provides DUI, criminal defense, and personal injury representation throughout Fresno and the greater Central Valley of California including Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Stanislaus, Tulare, and Tuolumne counties.

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter

    Contact Us

    The Law Office of Gregory W. Fox
    191 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 209
    Fresno, California 93704

    Phone: (559) 222-5800

    FAX: (559) 222-5801

    Hours:

    1. Monday–Thursday 8AM–5PM
    2. Friday 8AM–12PM
    3. Saturday–Sunday 9AM–4PM

    Get Directions

    Practice Areas

    • DUI Defense
    • Criminal Defense
    • Drug Crimes
    • Domestic Violence
    • Expungement
    • Personal Injury

    Site Footer

    • Top Criminal Defense Attorney in Fresno
    • Lawyer Gregory Fox | Featured Attorney Criminal Defense

    • Copyright © 2025
    • The Law Office of Gregory W. Fox
    • Privacy Policy